Saint Joseph, Spouse of the Blessed Virgin Mary
title.jpg (12714 bytes)

title2.jpg (9273 bytes)

Menu

The St. Joseph Foundation - Main

The History of the St. Joseph Foundation
The Foundation Today
Contact the St. Joseph Foundation
Christifidelis Newsletter
Canonical Issues
Meet the staff


 

 

merge.jpg (2327 bytes)

right.jpg (2401 bytes)

flower.jpg (5679 bytes)

CHRISTIFIDELIS

TO DEFEND CATHOLIC TRUTH AND UPHOLD CATHOLIC RIGHTS


February 25, 1998

The Season of Lent

Vol. 16, No. 1


Sex Education and Sexuality


By Philip C.L. Gray, J.C.L.

So the Lord God cast a deep sleep on the man, and while he was asleep He took out one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. The Lord God then built up into a woman the rib that He had taken from the man. When He brought her to the man, the man said: "This one, at last, is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; this one shall be called ‘woman,’ for out of ‘her man’ this one has been taken." That is why a man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife, and the two of them become one body. The man and his wife were both naked, yet they felt no shame (Gen. 2:21-25).

The woman saw that the tree was good for food, pleasing to the eyes, and desirable for gaining wisdom. So she took some of its fruit and ate it; and she also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. The eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized that they were naked (Gen. 3:6-7a).

A rapidly growing practice within the Church in the United States is the introduction of sex education in the classrooms of Catholic schools and catechism programs. For the purposes of this discussion, I understand the term classroom sex education to mean the presentation of explicit information concerning human sexual anatomy and practices, including but not limited to methods of contraception and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. I would not include discussion of the principles of Catholic sexual morality or the biological information that one would normally expect in a high school science class.

Under the guise of catechism, family life and development of virtues, several publishers of Catholic materials have marketed sex education programs. Most of these programs have received an imprimatur. Educators have introduced these programs into parochial schools and catechism programs. With advertisements being placed in home schooling journals and material lists, the market has now extended to home schooling.

The intent of this article is not to re-state the position of the Holy See on sex education. Nor do I intend to review specific programs. The intent of this article is threefold. First, I hope to inform our readers of specific issues relevant to development of sexuality. Secondly, using this information, I will offer suggestions on how to evaluate proposed classroom sex education programs. Finally, I will offer suggestions on addressing contentions that may arise—or already have arisen.

To properly understand human sexuality, any discussion must be placed within the context of salvation history, the nature of man and developmental psychology. Interdependent on free-will and the use of reason, human sexuality represents our humanity. It is a gift from God that distinguishes us from other animals. It is beautiful. Like all gifts from God and things of beauty, the development and use of human sexuality demands responsibility and faith.

When Adam and Eve sinned, they realized they were naked. Before their sin, they were clothed with the glory of God. Their naked bodies were not shameful, because they did not know they were naked. When they saw each other, they saw the glory of God; they saw His image and likeness. Having lost the glory of God through sin, they saw not God but themselves.

To restore us to grace, Christ became incarnate in the womb of Mary. He was born, taking upon Himself our human nature. Sinless He died. Glorious He rose. By His death and resurrection, we are restored to the grace of God and His glory. The faithful will not realize the full glory until the resurrection from the dead, when their bodies will rise, receive their souls again and be fully clothed with the grace and glory of God. They will be clothed in light.

Human nature has the gift of time. God, as he does with the angels, does not bestow upon us the fullness of our nature at once. In time, we develop and grow. When we make mistakes, we have the time to take responsibility for them and make amends. In short, it pertains to human nature to grow and develop, to mature gradually. In order to fully utilize the salvation offered by God, He admonishes us: "Do not conform yourself to this age but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and pleasing and perfect (Rom.12:2)."

When discussing human development in general, developmental psychology affirms the presence of three factors that affect each person: genetics, the environment and maturation. These three influences remain interdependent and continuous throughout the life of any individual. Genetics provides the structures and establishes the parameters of development. These parameters are not reached immediately, nor are the structures immediately employable. All influences from outside the individual make up the environment. Maturation represents a progressive unfolding of developmental structures used to reach established parameters. The effects of genetics and the environment cause a differing rate of maturation from person to person.

Because of the unique, interdependent mingling of genetics, environment and maturation, people develop at differing rates. No two people are the same.

Like all human development, sexuality unfolds at differing rates among our children. Different children understand sexuality issues in different ways. Most important, the ability to understand sexuality does not necessarily come with the development of the physical attributes associated with sex. Because of the sensitive nature of the topic and the serious consequences of improper formation, the development and formation of sexuality must be cultivated by those who best know the child. That is, those who best know the unique identity—including the cognitive, physical and spiritual development—of the child. It is essential that such formation must be completed by those who have the responsibility for providing a proper environment within which the child can mature and grow in grace. By Divine Will, these are none other than the parents themselves.

Before offering a method to evaluate proposed classroom sex education programs, I must emphasize that the best program is one entirely contained within the home. As stated by the Holy See, "The normal and fundamental method, already proposed in this guide, is personal dialog between parents and their children, that is, individual formation within the family circle (The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality, Pontifical Council for the Family, 129)." Such formation and education need no supplement in any classroom, especially one claiming to be Catholic, or indeed any place outside the home. It also goes without saying that it is the right of the parents to decide whether they need assistance in providing this individual formation within the family circle.

Parents are the primary educators of their children. All other educators obtain their authority to teach from the child’s parents. With this in mind, I offer eight questions to raise when evaluating any sex education program. First and most important, is the program parent-based? That is, does the program require collaboration with the parents of each child and respect their mind on the matter? Parents know their children better than anyone else. They know the unique nature and cultural context within which the child develops. They have a serious obligation to provide for the proper raising of the child. Their desires in regard to the development of their child’s sexuality must be respected.

Second, is the program optional? No one should be forced to participate in any sex education program against his or her will. This is a right of natural law and cannot be dispensed. Most within the public sector know this well. Unfortunately, within many Catholic schools, sex education programs are often linked with catechism programs. Students are not allowed to opt out. Without question, this is wrong.

Third, are classrooms segregated? It seems to be the common practice that boys and girls receive sex education together, just as they do every other subject. Depending on the content and the manner in which issues are presented and discussed, this can be an occasion of sin. At the very least, it is imprudent.

Fourth, are specific anatomy and the sex act discussed? One can be assured that if a program is entitled "sex education," anatomy and sex acts will be discussed. Within many "Catholic" programs, the emphasis is placed on the "development of human sexuality," "family life" or "education in the virtues."

Don’t let these phrases fool you. Review the content of the material. Many of these programs discuss specific human anatomy as early as the third grade—some earlier. One particular program teaches fifth grade children how to have sex, with an option to introduce this material in the fourth grade. They soften this information by combining it with material about God or loving one another. Don’t be seduced into thinking that this is a proper approach. Providing information about anatomy and sexual matters alongside information about God and prayer within a Christian environment is not development of virtues. It is simply education about sex, God and prayers.

Fifth, does the program introduce information about contraception and sterilization? Most programs target kindergarten through eighth grade. These children do not need to know about contraception and sterilization. Information about these evils requires explanation about body parts and their functions. Further, it desensitizes the children to the use of contraceptives and sterilization. Providing such information to children at this early age is scandalous.

Sixth, does the program use values clarification methods when discussing morality? In values clarification, objective, moral evils are downplayed. The focus becomes what the individual child feels or believes is moral based on his or her own personal experiences. The entire objective teaching authority of the Church in regard to faith and morals becomes questionable when values clarification is encouraged.

Seventh, does the material include teacher or parent resources that do not conform to Catholic doctrine or discipline? One particular program that bears an imprimatur lists teacher resources written by pro-choice and homosexual activists.

Finally, in overall perspective, does the material and presentation style of the teacher respect your child’s developmental stage? Even if no anatomy or sex act discussions take place, certain subject matter is best left to older ages. You, the parent, know best.

As a parent, you have the right to review the materials and methods used to educate your child. You have the right to opt your child out of any program not in conformity with your conscience. Do not be intimidated or beguiled into believing that you do not know what is best for your child. Violations of these rights should not be accepted in good faith.

In short, a program devoted to a true formation in the virtues must be placed within the context of salvation history. As such, the central focus is love for God above all else, and love for neighbor as an expression of love for Him. There is no need for discussions about sex, anatomy, contraception or sterilization. That should be left to the parents.

There are many resources available for parents who wish to evaluate a particular program in their school or parish. First and foremost, I encourage parents to obtain and read the document, "The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality," published by the Pontifical Council on the Family. This document provides an excellent synthesis of the Church’s position on sex education and formation in the virtues. Furthermore, this document includes numerous references and strong recommendations for parents and educators.

If you find yourself in disagreement with educators over sex education, I recommend four courses of action.

First, pray continually. Beg God to grant you and everyone involved His Wisdom and His Will. Pray for the conversion of hearts and a congenial solution.

Second, inform yourself. Start by reading the document noted above. Familiarize yourself with other resources as referenced in the document, particularly those from the Catechism and the Code of Canon Law. Review the controversial material in light of these resources carefully and prayerfully so you can then make an informed decision about how appropriate the program is for your child.

Third, associate yourself with other people of like mind. There is strength in numbers. If necessary, seek the assistance of professionals—psychologists, theologians, canon lawyers—who share your mind on the matter. As you are well aware, the St. Joseph Foundation is always ready to assist in the vindication of rights.

Finally, never act rashly; remain patient. Do not forget that you are deciding for the good of your children and the future of our Church. When a difficult contention arises, the atmosphere becomes confusing and emotions can take their toll on our minds. When authorities stall or provide less than professional responses, there is a tendency to make rash decisions and acts. This can endanger the chances of a mutually, agreeable solution. Ultimately, our children will suffer.

Sexuality is a beautiful gift from God. Sexual anatomy and stimulations remain a very small part of sexuality. Most important, sexuality encompasses our spirituality and attitudes. It remains ever dependent on free will and the use of reason. If we cultivate the virtues in the development of sexuality, the emphasis will be on God and we will be clothed in light. If the emphasis is on anatomy, sexual stimulations and values clarification, we will be ashamed of our nakedness when we hear the Lord walking in the garden of life.